Short Film Analysis – ‘Wasp’ – ‘Soft’
Film Studies / Jamie Pitcher / 27.09.2017
The short film ‘Soft’ (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Og1w2KrEgVg
) opens with a boy (later revealed to be called Scott) being beaten senseless
by a group of youths, the entirety of this short opening scene was filmed with
a low resolution camera, most likely with a mobile phone (I’ll get into more
detail about its significance as this review proceeds). Shortly after this scene,
the father is introduced, this character is very interesting as he somewhat
embodies the concept of vulnerability after he too is attacked by the same
group of youths, (again this scene is also filmed using a low resolution
camera); Scott’s father later discovers Scott’s (very visible) facial injuries
and continues to state (hypocritically) that as a grown man you should not back
away from a fight, you should instead stand up for yourself. This quite obvious
implication of what a masculine figure should be greatly contradicts how the
Scott’s father reacted when he was attacked; this apparent fear immediately
returns once it is revealed that the group followed Scott’s father home. Now
during the following scenes around 40 to 50 percent of them are filmed using
the same low resolution camera, this is likely to convey the apparent crudeness
of the youths and their disjointed, near violent world view which shows
contrast to the crisp, high resolution footage that is featured during scenes
where the youths aren’t visible. As the teens continue to taunt and irritate
Scott and his father, Scott actually shows a genuine desire to make them leave
once the weakness in his father begins to show, this suggests that Scott is
wounded upon seeing a man whom he deemed masculine and strong falling victim to
a group of mere teens. At this the father begins to hold his son back from
fighting, in a sense becoming the very fears that held both him and Scott back
when they were originally attacked.
The short film ‘Wasp’, (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VEwcAAJ-LE
) features an overworked mother with a family of three young girls (each
varying in age) and a baby boy; almost immediately the viewer(s) begin to
sympathise for the mother (although unaware of what she has experienced in her
past or why she has so many children when a father figure isn’t even present).
As the story develops it is clear that the mother is struggling to support her
family, this is done with frequent shots of a nearly empty (, cheap) purse to
emphasis the dire financial situation she is in; within key moments of the
short film she is seen giving her children small portions of drink and food to
share amongst them all, this suggests that the family has grown used to
challenge of living on such a slim budget. The film itself gets its name from
the most important scene featured relatively near to the end of the film, the
baby boy is exposed to wasp that crawls inside of its mouth momentarily before
leaving, however during this scene the mother becomes panicked and shows the
underlying weakness within her that she has tried to conceal for both her and
her family’s sakes, ultimately emphasising the stress put upon this single
mother in this time of disparity. This short film, whilst relatively uneventful
(excluding the one wasp scene mentioned prior,) seems to mainly focus on the
standards of life some must live with and how it can have dramatic effects on
their lives.
These two films, whilst completely different in terms of
story, share some relatively strong connections in terms of concept; they each
show the audience the difficulty of raising a family along with the physical
and mental limitations that can be brought about by having one. This general
theme of family struggles can be applied to many, we have to live and coexist
in less desirable situations all the time and that is what both of these short
films capture really well, how conflict and suppressed rage at one’s own place
in the world can have an interesting effect on the dynamic of those around you.
Jamie this is well written and you raise some pertinent points however it leans too much on the description of the action and feels almost like a review and not an analysis (which was requested and as your title promises) The elements of compare and contrast are not evident enough and there are NO pictures / screen shots to evidence your points. Going forward think about how many elements of CCCEO you have used? How could you have used more? Having said all that it is clear that you have a good understanding of the key concepts of Film Studies. Well Done.
ReplyDelete