Film Analysis – 'Free Fire' / Jamie Pitcher / Film Studies / 19/09/2017

The Film, ‘Free Fire’ (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Fire) (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohDQPlzzp1k) was directed by Ben Wheatly (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ben_Wheatley), it received a rating of 4/5 by ‘The Guardian’ and was initially released on the 6th of April 2017.
The film itself features an illegal gun sale being made by an anonymous party to the IRA, the general plot is that something goes wrong and the entire situation deteriorates, this leads to the directors interpretation of what an actual gun fight would look like. It is quite easy to see, even early on in the film that the director was trying for something new, through his own independent research he learned that most gun fights aren’t at all like those featured in most thrillers/action movies, instead most shots fired actually miss or just (slightly) injure the targets being fired upon, by throwing in slight comedic qualities with the overall tension of a gun fight, ‘Free Fire’ was born.
The film itself really captures that 1980’s aesthetic with the colourful, ‘hip’ clothes worn by each character which only adds to the fun as they are gradually scuffed and torn to pieces by the oncoming bullets; the film is not to be taken seriously as the characters, still intent on killing one another, tend to throw some witty banter in each other’s direction, this gives the film an interesting dynamic as you gradually grow to love each of their personalities and eventually get confused with who your rooting for.
The film itself has a running time of 90 minutes yet the set stays the same for almost the entire film, the director likely did this to create a sense of feeling trapped whilst also allowing the viewer to become more familiar with the area in which the fight is taking place, this really intrigued me, as the viewer I began to picture the entire conflict differently, being able to tell where each character is at almost any time almost allows you to predict how any future movement will turn out, this ultimately made me feel more involved with the story and in turn, with the characters acting it out. Whilst the main body of the film is featured within only one (relatively large, open) set, the story/setting never seems to get boring, the sense of mortality that is applied to each and every character kept me (the viewer) on the edge of my seat for almost all of the film’s duration. This film contains a rather large amount of mature humour and graphic violence, ‘Vernon’, played by Sharlto Copley (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharlto_Copley ) is personally one of my favourite characters, simply because presents such an aura of vulgarity, self-confidence, selfishness and greed, he quickly becomes one of the most entertaining aspects of this movie; however his character also represents what drives this conflict, his self-indulgent belief that he should win seems to act as a violent catalyst and ultimately gives this film the strength to continue.

A good film I could relate to ‘Free Fire’ would be the incredible title, ‘Saving Private Ryan’; much like ‘Free Fire’, ‘Saving Private Ryan’ presents its characters with seemingly very real threats. The bullets and strikes feel as though they have a weight to them as they dash across the screen and collide with solid surfaces or human bodies, this is also a very good example of the (digital) effects used within ‘Free Fire’ to give it the enriching appeal of realistic combat and what mainly won me over as a viewer, (In short, this film features riveting fight scenes, good (mature) comedic themes, however it was slightly lacking a deeper plot which I feel could have given this film the 5 star rating it truly deserves).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Pan's Labyrinth' Opening and Ending scene analysis/comparison

Film Scene Analysis - 'No Country for Old Men' - Coin flipping scenes

Film Analysis - 'Fish Tank' (Directed by Andrea Arnold)